GD Star Rating
loading...

A US based law firm deploys robotrolls to send alerts to pirates involved in mass BitTorrent lawsuit

 June21, 2012: Prenda Law, a law firm operating in the US has deployed a sophisticated tool that sends alerts to the pirates accused in the mass level BitTorrent lawsuits through robocalls.

The announcement thus includes the threat to file a lawsuit against the accused as they have failed to settle the matter. According to critics, this new strategy might be challenging the law, irrespective of their effect on the users. 

The case dates back to 2010 when a bulk of BitTorrent users were dragged to the US court in the wake of their involvement in the sharing of copyrighted films without seeking the permission of the owners. Though the copyright holders never aimed to take the case to courtroom, all they wanted was to settle the dispute outside court by managing the alleged copyright infringers to pay them a fixed amount to get away with the case; the introduction of robotrolls is meant to serve this very cause.

Most have termed this scheme as no less than extortion, yet the copyright owners defy the criticism by terming it as an important move to protect their copyrighted work. 

Prenda law is among the most active law companies associated with Bittorrent lawsuits and have sued many pirates on the behalf of its clients from the adult entertainment industry.

It has even been accused of harassing the account holders involved in infringement activities that includes threat calls to urge them pay hefty amounts in order to get rid of the lawsuits.

Not surprisingly, despite the possibilities of these robocalls being cheap and effective, the law firm has invited high end criticism owing to its way of approaching the accused pirates.

In a shocking revelation, Prenda Law is reported to be bothering all the defendants that have their names in the company’s database, irrespective of whether their cases are currently under trial or have been already dismissed. Additionally, it also doesn’t cease contacting the accused who have hired attorneys to represent their case.

All these nuisance clearly depict the extent to which these law firms can go to get settlements in the favor of copyright holders they work for.

Moreover, many judges have also experienced this pathetic situation. Just to cite an example, in New York Eastern District court, the judges were asked to close these lawsuits concerning them as “waste of judicial resources”.

Some of the judges have also came down heavily on such threatening incidents by passing strict orders to ISPs on not to disclose the contact number of the account holders.

However, the law firms are able to get over these jurisdictions somehow and manage to settle down the infringement issues in exchange of sumptuous amount from the accused users, and robocalls is there latest mode to accomplish such a disgusting task.

Unfortunately there is no stopping to these so called torch bearers of law and they are expected to continue flourishing in their business with several identical ways now and then.
——–

Follow us on Facebook and Twitter to remain updated with all the everything on VPN Service.

You can also see here the all time Top 10 VPN Providers list. Wish you a Happy and Private Internet Life !!

Allen is an internet secuirty and privacy geek. He is an Editor at Bestvpnservice.com and loves to explore new VPN Services and technologies. He is also in love with blogging, his life (not wife) and travelling. He is a die hard soccer fan and is crazy for Manchester United.
GD Star Rating
loading...

One Response to New Robocalls tool to alert online users accused of copyright infringement!

  1. [...] in Denmark Uffe Elbæk has curtailed down the  possibilities of warning letters being issued to copyright infringers by [...]

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>